Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year 4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore 4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 51 Scimago H index 51
Volume 9, issue 12 | Copyright
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4365-4380, 2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 06 Dec 2016

Methods for assessment of models | 06 Dec 2016

A diagram for evaluating multiple aspects of model performance in simulating vector fields

Zhongfeng Xu et al.
Related authors
Multivariable integrated evaluation of model performance with the vector field evaluation diagram
Zhongfeng Xu, Ying Han, and Congbin Fu
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3805-3820,,, 2017
Related subject area
Climate and Earth System Modeling
sympl (v. 0.4.0) and climt (v. 0.15.3) – towards a flexible framework for building model hierarchies in Python
Joy Merwin Monteiro, Jeremy McGibbon, and Rodrigo Caballero
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3781-3794,,, 2018
Requirements for a global data infrastructure in support of CMIP6
Venkatramani Balaji, Karl E. Taylor, Martin Juckes, Bryan N. Lawrence, Paul J. Durack, Michael Lautenschlager, Chris Blanton, Luca Cinquini, Sébastien Denvil, Mark Elkington, Francesca Guglielmo, Eric Guilyardi, David Hassell, Slava Kharin, Stefan Kindermann, Sergey Nikonov, Aparna Radhakrishnan, Martina Stockhause, Tobias Weigel, and Dean Williams
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3659-3680,,, 2018
Climate model configurations of the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (ECMWF-IFS cycle 43r1) for HighResMIP
Christopher D. Roberts, Retish Senan, Franco Molteni, Souhail Boussetta, Michael Mayer, and Sarah P. E. Keeley
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3681-3712,,, 2018
Using a virtual machine environment for developing, testing, and training for the UM-UKCA composition-climate model, using Unified Model version 10.9 and above
Nathan Luke Abraham, Alexander T. Archibald, Paul Cresswell, Sam Cusworth, Mohit Dalvi, David Matthews, Steven Wardle, and Stuart Whitehouse
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3647-3657,,, 2018
FAME (v1.0): a simple module to simulate the effect of planktonic foraminifer species-specific habitat on their oxygen isotopic content
Didier M. Roche, Claire Waelbroeck, Brett Metcalfe, and Thibaut Caley
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3587-3603,,, 2018
Cited articles
Charles, B. N.: Utility of stretch vector correlation coefficients, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 85, 287–290,, 1959.
Chaudhuri, A. H., Ponte, R. M., Forget, G., and Heimbach, P.: A comparison of atmospheric reanalysis surface products over the ocean and implications for uncertainties in air–sea boundary forcing, J. Climate, 26, 153–170, 2013.
Crosby, D. S., Breaker, L .C., and Gemmill, W. H.: A proposed definition for vector correlation in geophysics: Theory and application, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 10, 355–367, 1993.
Ellison, T. H.: On the correlation of vectors, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 80, 93–96,, 1954.
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
This paper devises a new diagram called the vector field evaluation (VFE) diagram. The VFE diagram is a generalized Taylor diagram and is able to provide a concise evaluation of model performance in simulating vector fields (e.g., vector winds) in terms of three statistical variables. The VFE diagram can be applied to the evaluation of full vector fields or anomaly fields as needed. Some potential applications of the VFE diagram in model evaluation are also presented in the paper.
This paper devises a new diagram called the vector field evaluation (VFE) diagram. The VFE...